1. What is the author arguing?
Eisenhower is giving his last speech as President of the United States. He used this final speech to voice his concerns for the future and what he hoped and thought should take place for the future of a peaceful nation. He starts by speaking of the country and his accomplishments and his concerns amongst them. "Understandably proud of this pre-eminence, we yet realize that America's leadership and prestige depend, not merely upon our unmatched material progress, riches and military strength, but on how we use our power in the interests of world peace and human betterment." His arguments lie in the concern of "grievous hurt both at home and abroad." He speaks of our emmence military strength and his concern for military industrial complex. "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex." His arguments have a constant theme of the future of this country needs to be in the hands of its people. "Only an alert and knowledgable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together."
He speaks of the importance of time. "you, I, and our government --must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convinience, the precious resource of tomorrow." and continues on to say "we want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow."
2. How does the author appeal to logos (logic), pathos (emotional quality), and ethos (the writer’s perceived character) with their argument?
He spoke with respect for the country and its people." I thank you for the many opportunities you have given me for public service in war and peace." He was not just giving his opinions to call the shots but making logical suggestions for a peaceful nation through genuine concern and apparent knowledge. He speaks knowledgably as not only the leader of the country but with military expertise. He speaks of "mutual trust and respect." He acknowledges what he was unable to accomplish and recognizes his own "definite sense of dissappointment." Because of his readiness to address his disappointment in his actions as well as praise of accomplishments he makes himself seem human and not just this almost unreal public figure "President". I thought this statement however simple it was left me trusting his opinion, "But, so much remains to be done. As a private citizin, I shall never cease to do what little I can to help the world advance along the road." He backs up all his concerns with valid points about how times have changed and how this nation is one of military and technolgical developments now.
3. What is the historical significance/relevance of this document?
This documents signifigance lie in the warnings Eisenhower gives the American people in his last nights as President. He spoke alot about military industry and the arms race. It is interesting to note the focus he had made on the creation of nuclear weapons throughout his presidency and how in this speech he speaks of such concern for the country over one of his decisions. Eisenhower really focused on the importance of democracy. He knew that the country was at risk of military dominance and was able to voice his last bits of wisdom as the trusted leader of this country.
4. Do you find the author’s argument convincing? Why or why not?
Yes, I found Eisenhower's speech convincing. He showed genuine concern and admiration for this country. His speech was spoken in a manner of calculated thoughtful suggestion. He was respectful of the American people and his successor and used these last moments in power to warn the Nation. His background as a General and President makes his credibility stronger as well.
